Reviewed November 6, 2026

The DOJ Title II Rule: What the April 2026 Deadline Actually Required

The DOJ Title II rule gave state and local governments a deadline, and the first one passed in April 2026. Governments serving 50,000 or more people had to make their web content and mobile apps meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA by April 24, 2026. Smaller governments get until April 26, 2027. The rule is federal, it is specific, and it is the clearest accessibility deadline in American law.

The rule matters beyond government, because it is the first time a federal agency has named a technical standard and a date in the same regulation. For years, accessibility obligations were argued from a statute that never named a standard. Now there is one, with a deadline attached, and the courts and the plaintiffs' lawyers are reading it.

What the rule actually requires

The rule, published April 24, 2024, requires state and local governments to make their web content and mobile apps conform to WCAG 2.1 Level AA. It applies under Title II of the ADA, which covers government services, and it sets two compliance dates: April 24, 2026 for governments serving 50,000 or more people, and April 26, 2027 for smaller ones. The standard is WCAG 2.1, not 2.2, because 2.1 was the current version when the rule was written.

The rule covers the content the government publishes and the apps it provides, including content posted by third parties on government pages in some circumstances. It is not a suggestion. It is a regulation with the force of law, and the Department of Justice can enforce it.

Why Shopify stores should still read it

Private stores are Title III, not Title II, so the rule does not apply to them directly. But the rule sets the standard that courts and plaintiffs' lawyers point at, and WCAG 2.1 Level AA is the same bar demand letters already cite. A store that meets the Title II standard is meeting the standard the private cases argue about, and a store that does not is arguing against a federal regulation that says what accessible means.

The practical effect is that the argument about which standard applies is over. The standard is WCAG 2.1 Level AA, the dates are set, and the question for a private store is whether it meets that bar, not whether the bar exists.

The exceptions, and how narrow they are

The rule has exceptions for archived content, preexisting documents, and a few other narrow categories. Archived content means content kept only for reference or recordkeeping, not content people still use. A form from 2019 that nobody fills in anymore may be exempt. A form from 2019 that people still use is not.

The exceptions are narrow by design, and they do not cover the content that matters: the pages people visit, the forms they fill in, the apps they use. A government that relies on the exceptions for its live content is misreading the rule.

Related reading

Related reading: An ADA Title III Demand Letter Is Not a Verdict: What the Days After It Arrives Actually Decide, What an Accessibility Statement Should Actually Include, and What a website accessibility audit actually covers.

Frequently asked questions

Does the DOJ Title II rule apply to private businesses?

No, not directly. Title II covers state and local governments. Private businesses fall under Title III, which has no regulation naming a standard. The Title II rule still matters for private stores, because it names WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the standard, and that is the bar demand letters cite.

What is the compliance deadline for small governments?

April 26, 2027, for governments serving fewer than 50,000 people. Larger governments, serving 50,000 or more, had until April 24, 2026. The two dates are in the rule, and they are the dates to plan around.

Which WCAG version does the rule require?

WCAG 2.1 Level AA. That was the current version when the rule was published in April 2024. WCAG 2.2 adds criteria, and meeting 2.2 also meets 2.1, so a store that targets 2.2 is covered either way.

Can a government ask for more time?

The rule has limited provisions for individualized assessments and for content that cannot be made accessible, but there is no general extension process. The dates are the dates, and the compliance work should have started when the rule was published, not when the deadline arrived.